Overheard on the Hill, Hypothetically

water blog photograph

Source: russeljsmith via Flickr

I don’t follow politics that closely anymore, so I don’t really know how nature protection and pollution control are faring overall in the Congressional haggling over the so-called “stimulus bill.” But I do know that on the way to reaching an acceptable compromise, Senate Democrats and Republicans cut some things that you care about, including $65 million for “watershed rehabilitation.”

I bet the negotiation over that point went about like this:

Republican Budget Staffer: “We’ve got to cut this spending bill down some more, we’ve got to plan ahead, we can’t burden future generations of Americans with such huge debts.”

Democratic Budget Staffer: “But the economy is in a crisis, we’ve got to make some investments to get people back to work so they can feed their families.”

Republican Budget Staffer: “So how does this do that: $65 million for ‘watershed rehabilitation?’ What the &^%$#@! is that?”

Democratic Budget Staffer: “Ummm…I’m not sure. So tell you what, we’ll cut that, but we’ll keep the $85 million to build a bridge through that buggy swamp in my boss’s district. Deal?”

Republican Budget Staffer: “Deal. Next item…”

Words matter most in crises… when decisions get made very quickly.

    About Water Words That Work, LLC

    Water Words That Work, LLC helps nature protection and pollution control organizations professionalize and modernize their communications. Let us help you succeed with your next fundraising, issue advocacy, or pollution prevention campaign.

    Related Posts

    Leave a Reply

    Please use your real name instead of you company name or keyword spam.

    *