One of the most common mistakes nature protection and pollution control experts make in their communications efforts is to mishandle the economic issue. Because we often find ourselves up against (and sometimes losing to) business interests making economic arguments, it seems like we should make an effort to win on that point. Here’s the latest example that landed in my inbox — an email from the good folks at Restore America’s Estuaries — but I see lots of similar examples:
I’m sure if I actually read the report that I would learn how estuaries provide gazillions of dollars in various economic benefits to society, including fisheries, outdoor recreation, protection from storms, higher property values, etc… For the record, I believe it.
But when it comes to everyday citizens, there are two things you have to keep in mind. They:
This second point often dismays people like us, but it well documented. Here’s one good quote:
A finding that deserves emphasis here is that the contribution of fishing and boating to the local community and the conservation of natural resources is not seen as believable.
So what’s a good conservationist to do? When you’re trying to reach everyday citizens, I have two suggestions:
But some of us Ph.D.s are trying to learn to do better!