May
30
Filed Under (Media, Recommendation) by waterwordsthatwork on 30-05-2007

Link to the contest

Does anybody out there want to team up with me to compete in the “Intelligent Use of Water” video competition? I’d love to try it, but I’ll need a partner.

Here’s a quick description of the opportunity:

Now is your opportunity to help raise awareness of the need to conserve and protect water. Create a short film proposing an intelligent way to manage and efficiently use the earth’s most precious resource. Submit your entry by August 15, 2007. Finalists will be presented at a screening event in Los Angeles, and cash prizes total $9,000.

The full contest description and rules are posted here: http://www.iuowfilm.com.

If you’ve got a brain full of water conservation solutions, I’ve got a camcorder, a big collection of stock footage, and the gift of gab. I’m handy with scripts, lighting, editing, and audio.

But I need somebody with a great idea that I can turn into a winning video. It helps if you’re in the Washington DC metro area, but if you’ve got a good internet connection, geography is a surmountable obstacle. The rules do not require those who participate to be U.S. citizens.

Post a comment or drop me a note at eric dot eckl at waterwordsthatwork dot com.

Hat tip to Nalts at the Will Video for Food blog for announcing this opportunity.

May
29

In many parts of the country, natural water sources are being pushed to the limit. Watch today’s episode to learn how to sound the alarm — without being dismissed as an alarmist.

Click to see the full report

Source: Texas Water IQ: Focus Group Report

<

Citations for today’s episode
Download this episode to your computer or video iPod

May
29
Filed Under (Critique) by waterwordsthatwork on 29-05-2007

Ellerbe Creek Watershed AssociationThe Ellerbe Creek Watershed Association, in Durham, NC, wants to replace the logo you see on the left, and they’re lifting a page from MoveOn.org’s playbook to do it: holding a design contest and inviting all comers to submit logos for their consideration.

It’s not clear how they’ll judge the entries, but they should consider inviting the members to vote. Give everybody a chance to make a little emotional investment in the organization!

There’s a lot to be said for this kind of approach and I hope it works out for them. If they do a good job promoting the contest, a lot of designers will check out their website, learn about their organization, and discuss their participation in the contest with their friends and family. That’s word of mouth PR for the group - the best kind. Furthermore, the winning designer may just be more interested in making a difference than making a buck. When they realize what they can do to help the group, they might do more: volunteering to redesign the website or newsletter, for example. It doesn’t hurt to ask.

Now of course, it’s also possible that the group will only get a few entries and won’t like any of them. In that case, there are some new services on the market that will design your logos at very affordable rates.

Good luck to the Ellerbe Creek Watershed Association!

May
24
Filed Under (Critique) by waterwordsthatwork on 24-05-2007

Click to see the newsletter

For more than a dozen years now, I’ve been picking up copies of the Potomac Basin Reporter, newsletter of the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin. You can reliably find it on the brochure rack at outdoor stores and park visitor centers all around the Washington DC metropolitan area.

Somebody went to a lot of trouble at one point to set up this network of outlets, and it’s still a viable way to get the good word out. Instinctively, we know that outdoorsy people are more likely to care about the river than couch potatoes, and research tells us outdoorsy people are also more active in civic life than the couch potato set. So putting our message in front of them this way is just plain smart.

But my spidey senses are tingling, and they’re telling me this particular effort isn’t quite fulfilling on its promise. That’s because there’s a mismatch between how the newsletter is circulated and and how it’s written. Many issues are chock full of terminology that most park goers and outdoor store shoppers won’t get: watershed, nonregulatory, stormwater, and plenty of government-insider acronyms. It’s kind of like trying to entertain a bunch of six year olds by popping an episode of PBS Masterpiece Theater in the DVD player.

How does this happen? Probably because the editorial board is a group of earnest professionals who use each other as the frame of reference — and have completely lost sight of the potential readers browsing the brochure rack at REI.

So here’s a quick tip for improving the newsletter, and it won’t cost a penny or hurt a bit: Next time the editorial board meets to discuss the upcoming issue, they should do it at one of the parks where the newsletter is distributed. As they discuss what to include, what to leave out, and how to write it, they can observe the families with strollers and picnic baskets milling about, eavesdrop on the fishermen asking questions to the park rangers, and watch the school groups romp in front of the educational displays.

If they do that, I bet the gap between the language and the audience will start to close.

Anybody else got a suggestion to share?